All workFrame 02 / 12

CASE 02 — Healthcare · AI co-pilot

Case sheetCase No. 02

Project
Choosing a Medicare plan at 65
Client
US health insurer
Category
Healthcare · AI co-pilot
Year
2022–23
Role
UX lead, pitch track
Team
India + Boston CX team

LeadAmit Chotia

Choosing a Medicare plan at 65 for US health insurer

The short version

Meet Mona: 65, retiring this fall, facing a complexity of choices — and the one agent she trusts is on holiday. From transactional to intelligent.

Outcome

Prototype credited in winning the engagement

SC 01

Mona is 65, retiring this fall, and needs a Medicare Advantage plan within the enrolment window. The choices are complex, and the one agent she trusts with her health records is on holiday.

The brief: an end-to-end enrolment experience for a US health insurer — from transactional to intelligent. Before any design work, a sentiment analysis of the research brief and the market told us that around two-thirds of what customers felt was negative.

SC 02 · The person

We opened the pitch with a person rather than a product. Mona is 65, a retired accountant, retiring this fall and moving into a new setup of life. She needs a Medicare Advantage plan inside the enrolment window — and the one agent she trusts with her health records is on holiday.

Every decision after this had to answer one question: does this help Mona decide, on her own, without feeling she chose wrong?

Mona at 65 — the brief, in her words
Fig. 02.1Mona at 65 — the brief, in her words
SC 03 · Listen first

Before any screen, we ran a sentiment analysis across the research brief and the market. Around 66% of the sentiment was negative and about 30% neutral and adaptable. The themes were familiar but sharp: overwhelming information, cost-consciousness, health concerns, data privacy, a complex and lengthy process, and plans that went quiet after activation.

That number set the brief. We weren't designing a better catalogue of plans — we were designing confidence.

Sentiment analysis, prior to any design effort
Fig. 02.2Sentiment analysis, prior to any design effort
SC 04 · The journey

We shaped the enrolment around four moments: onboarding that asks about Mona before it shows plans; prescription savings that switch her to a generic or mail-order when it's cheaper; cost-saving options that put a real number on the screen (save up to $260 on a co-pay); and post-enrolment, where an onboarding checklist keeps going after the purchase.

The last one mattered most. The fear of having chosen wrong doesn't end at checkout — so neither should the journey.

Onboarding, prescription savings, cost-saving options, post-enrolment
Fig. 02.3Onboarding, prescription savings, cost-saving options, post-enrolment
SC 05 · Three years on

For the second pitch we moved the story forward. Mona is now 68, a loyal member, relocating to another state mid-year — and again in an immediate need for a new plan. This time she stumbles on a Customer Co-Pilot, an AI assistant that stays with her across the shopping journey.

We designed it across three interaction models, so we could show the client where AI helps and where a human should take over.

The same person, three years later
Fig. 02.4The same person, three years later
SC 06 · What AI should know

We framed the Co-Pilot in three layers. What we know (being reactive): her history, her doctors, her claims. What we can know (being proactive): offering contextually relevant information she might overlook. What we should know (being predictive): building personalised health scenarios that help her choose.

Adaptive AI learning let it notice the moments that needed a person, and hand over smoothly to chat or tele-sales — instead of pretending to be one.

Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history (1 of 2)Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history (2 of 2)
Fig. 02.5Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history
SC 07 · Multimodal

The final prototype let Mona ask the way she'd ask an agent — by typing or by speaking — and see her current plan, doctors, network coverage and drug costs update alongside the conversation.

The pitch team took the click-through prototype to the client. It was credited as a significant part of winning the engagement.

Multimodal interaction prototype
Fig. 02.6Multimodal interaction prototype
SC 08

A click-through prototype across text and speech that the pitch team took to the client — credited as a significant part of winning the engagement.

Take 1
~66%
Negative sentiment, before design
Take 2
4
Journey stages redesigned
Take 3
3
AI interaction models

Next case · 03 / 12

Rewards for people who live on the road

US travel-centre network · Loyalty · Mobile · Voice · Sales POC

An unbiased, unconventional review of a truck-stop rewards app for 1M+ guests — starting with the trucker, not the points.

All workFrame 02 / 12

CASE 02 — Healthcare · AI co-pilot

Case sheetCase No. 02

Project
Choosing a Medicare plan at 65
Client
US health insurer
Category
Healthcare · AI co-pilot
Year
2022–23
Role
UX lead, pitch track
Team
India + Boston CX team

LeadAmit Chotia

Choosing a Medicare plan at 65 for US health insurer

The short version

Meet Mona: 65, retiring this fall, facing a complexity of choices — and the one agent she trusts is on holiday. From transactional to intelligent.

Outcome

Prototype credited in winning the engagement

SC 01

Mona is 65, retiring this fall, and needs a Medicare Advantage plan within the enrolment window. The choices are complex, and the one agent she trusts with her health records is on holiday.

The brief: an end-to-end enrolment experience for a US health insurer — from transactional to intelligent. Before any design work, a sentiment analysis of the research brief and the market told us that around two-thirds of what customers felt was negative.

SC 02 · The person

We opened the pitch with a person rather than a product. Mona is 65, a retired accountant, retiring this fall and moving into a new setup of life. She needs a Medicare Advantage plan inside the enrolment window — and the one agent she trusts with her health records is on holiday.

Every decision after this had to answer one question: does this help Mona decide, on her own, without feeling she chose wrong?

Mona at 65 — the brief, in her words
Fig. 02.1Mona at 65 — the brief, in her words
SC 03 · Listen first

Before any screen, we ran a sentiment analysis across the research brief and the market. Around 66% of the sentiment was negative and about 30% neutral and adaptable. The themes were familiar but sharp: overwhelming information, cost-consciousness, health concerns, data privacy, a complex and lengthy process, and plans that went quiet after activation.

That number set the brief. We weren't designing a better catalogue of plans — we were designing confidence.

Sentiment analysis, prior to any design effort
Fig. 02.2Sentiment analysis, prior to any design effort
SC 04 · The journey

We shaped the enrolment around four moments: onboarding that asks about Mona before it shows plans; prescription savings that switch her to a generic or mail-order when it's cheaper; cost-saving options that put a real number on the screen (save up to $260 on a co-pay); and post-enrolment, where an onboarding checklist keeps going after the purchase.

The last one mattered most. The fear of having chosen wrong doesn't end at checkout — so neither should the journey.

Onboarding, prescription savings, cost-saving options, post-enrolment
Fig. 02.3Onboarding, prescription savings, cost-saving options, post-enrolment
SC 05 · Three years on

For the second pitch we moved the story forward. Mona is now 68, a loyal member, relocating to another state mid-year — and again in an immediate need for a new plan. This time she stumbles on a Customer Co-Pilot, an AI assistant that stays with her across the shopping journey.

We designed it across three interaction models, so we could show the client where AI helps and where a human should take over.

The same person, three years later
Fig. 02.4The same person, three years later
SC 06 · What AI should know

We framed the Co-Pilot in three layers. What we know (being reactive): her history, her doctors, her claims. What we can know (being proactive): offering contextually relevant information she might overlook. What we should know (being predictive): building personalised health scenarios that help her choose.

Adaptive AI learning let it notice the moments that needed a person, and hand over smoothly to chat or tele-sales — instead of pretending to be one.

Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history (1 of 2)Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history (2 of 2)
Fig. 02.5Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history
SC 07 · Multimodal

The final prototype let Mona ask the way she'd ask an agent — by typing or by speaking — and see her current plan, doctors, network coverage and drug costs update alongside the conversation.

The pitch team took the click-through prototype to the client. It was credited as a significant part of winning the engagement.

Multimodal interaction prototype
Fig. 02.6Multimodal interaction prototype
SC 08

A click-through prototype across text and speech that the pitch team took to the client — credited as a significant part of winning the engagement.

Take 1
~66%
Negative sentiment, before design
Take 2
4
Journey stages redesigned
Take 3
3
AI interaction models

Next case · 03 / 12

Rewards for people who live on the road

US travel-centre network · Loyalty · Mobile · Voice · Sales POC

An unbiased, unconventional review of a truck-stop rewards app for 1M+ guests — starting with the trucker, not the points.

All workFrame 02 / 12

CASE 02 — Healthcare · AI co-pilot

Case sheetCase No. 02

Project
Choosing a Medicare plan at 65
Client
US health insurer
Category
Healthcare · AI co-pilot
Year
2022–23
Role
UX lead, pitch track
Team
India + Boston CX team

LeadAmit Chotia

Choosing a Medicare plan at 65 for US health insurer

The short version

Meet Mona: 65, retiring this fall, facing a complexity of choices — and the one agent she trusts is on holiday. From transactional to intelligent.

Outcome

Prototype credited in winning the engagement

SC 01

Mona is 65, retiring this fall, and needs a Medicare Advantage plan within the enrolment window. The choices are complex, and the one agent she trusts with her health records is on holiday.

The brief: an end-to-end enrolment experience for a US health insurer — from transactional to intelligent. Before any design work, a sentiment analysis of the research brief and the market told us that around two-thirds of what customers felt was negative.

SC 02 · The person

We opened the pitch with a person rather than a product. Mona is 65, a retired accountant, retiring this fall and moving into a new setup of life. She needs a Medicare Advantage plan inside the enrolment window — and the one agent she trusts with her health records is on holiday.

Every decision after this had to answer one question: does this help Mona decide, on her own, without feeling she chose wrong?

Mona at 65 — the brief, in her words
Fig. 02.1Mona at 65 — the brief, in her words
SC 03 · Listen first

Before any screen, we ran a sentiment analysis across the research brief and the market. Around 66% of the sentiment was negative and about 30% neutral and adaptable. The themes were familiar but sharp: overwhelming information, cost-consciousness, health concerns, data privacy, a complex and lengthy process, and plans that went quiet after activation.

That number set the brief. We weren't designing a better catalogue of plans — we were designing confidence.

Sentiment analysis, prior to any design effort
Fig. 02.2Sentiment analysis, prior to any design effort
SC 04 · The journey

We shaped the enrolment around four moments: onboarding that asks about Mona before it shows plans; prescription savings that switch her to a generic or mail-order when it's cheaper; cost-saving options that put a real number on the screen (save up to $260 on a co-pay); and post-enrolment, where an onboarding checklist keeps going after the purchase.

The last one mattered most. The fear of having chosen wrong doesn't end at checkout — so neither should the journey.

Onboarding, prescription savings, cost-saving options, post-enrolment
Fig. 02.3Onboarding, prescription savings, cost-saving options, post-enrolment
SC 05 · Three years on

For the second pitch we moved the story forward. Mona is now 68, a loyal member, relocating to another state mid-year — and again in an immediate need for a new plan. This time she stumbles on a Customer Co-Pilot, an AI assistant that stays with her across the shopping journey.

We designed it across three interaction models, so we could show the client where AI helps and where a human should take over.

The same person, three years later
Fig. 02.4The same person, three years later
SC 06 · What AI should know

We framed the Co-Pilot in three layers. What we know (being reactive): her history, her doctors, her claims. What we can know (being proactive): offering contextually relevant information she might overlook. What we should know (being predictive): building personalised health scenarios that help her choose.

Adaptive AI learning let it notice the moments that needed a person, and hand over smoothly to chat or tele-sales — instead of pretending to be one.

Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history (1 of 2)Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history (2 of 2)
Fig. 02.5Adaptive handover · top 5 plan recommendations from her history
SC 07 · Multimodal

The final prototype let Mona ask the way she'd ask an agent — by typing or by speaking — and see her current plan, doctors, network coverage and drug costs update alongside the conversation.

The pitch team took the click-through prototype to the client. It was credited as a significant part of winning the engagement.

Multimodal interaction prototype
Fig. 02.6Multimodal interaction prototype
SC 08

A click-through prototype across text and speech that the pitch team took to the client — credited as a significant part of winning the engagement.

Take 1
~66%
Negative sentiment, before design
Take 2
4
Journey stages redesigned
Take 3
3
AI interaction models

Next case · 03 / 12

Rewards for people who live on the road

US travel-centre network · Loyalty · Mobile · Voice · Sales POC

An unbiased, unconventional review of a truck-stop rewards app for 1M+ guests — starting with the trucker, not the points.

Contact…

Gurgaon · IST

Hiring for design leadership, or a journey that needs someone to look at it from the other side? Write to me — I reply within a day.

Email me

Contact…

Gurgaon · IST

Hiring for design leadership, or a journey that needs someone to look at it from the other side? Write to me — I reply within a day.

Email me

Contact…

Gurgaon · IST

Hiring for design leadership, or a journey that needs someone to look at it from the other side? Write to me — I reply within a day.

Email me
Prod.Portfolio 2026
SceneFooter
Take1
RollAC-26
DirectorAmit Chotia
Date 
Buildv1 · Oct 2026

Thanks for reading to the end. Say hello — I read every message and reply within a day.

Write to meamitchotia9@gmail.com